🎰 Check Shove Poker - Kreu | Facebook

Most Liked Casino Bonuses in the last 7 days 🤑

Filter:
Sort:
G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

This is a simplified game where the SB is only allowed to go all-in or fold, and the BB can either call or fold when facing a shove. No Ante; Ante 10% ...


Enjoy!
The Best Short Stack Poker Strategy (Free Poker Chart) | BlackRain79 - Micro Stakes Poker Strategy
Valid for casinos
Tournament Push-or-Fold Decision Calculator - Exceptional Poker...
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Say you want to play mathematical poker and you want to balance your pre shove range.
A range where your opponent has shown strength.
Either they came in for a raise and you are in position or they raised you when you opened out of position.
Assume you always open for 2.
Assume you are medium stack 30-40 BB inside the Harrington green zone.
The object here is how wide to make your range so you can get optimal action when you do have AA KK.
The bottom of your range will likely be behind but it is sacrificed to get more action when you are ahead.
If you only shove with QQ+ there are not very many hands 18.
If your opponent knows you only shove with QQ+ then they should only call with KK+.
Not enough poker shove to get action when you do have AA.
If you shove with TT+ now you should mathematically get action from QQ+.
Is that enough balance.
So now AA and KK can get action from KK and QQ.
TT+ feels kind of tight to me and I would add in AKs.
Still only 34 hands.
But then only 40% equity against JJ+.
I think a better question would have been to put the opponent on a range but I already asked it.
What I kind of like about a tight raise range is now your call hands can include some strong hands.
I know should mix up play.
And should mix in bluffs.
This a somewhat hypothetical question.
In real life I would add in some What would be your shove range in that situation?
I would like to get the math but just your opinion is good.
I don't think position matters here as this is limited to a re-raise and there is no position after an all in.
You come in for 5 and get raised to 10.
There would be like 16 in the pot.
You have 25 behind so it is not that much of an over-bet.
If you have 60 you would have 55 behind so it is a big over-bet.
But if you raise to 30 you are pot committed and they know it.
Should I assume a BSS from the other party?
You said you were above green zone but also said the guy is above you.
I ask: How many times above?
Even if it is chips if they have more chips than me it is just my stack I am betting.
I would not want to.
I don't know if, so far, I understood correctly.
It certainly plays better than TT that is 20%.
I look forward to answers.
This would require you somewhat analyze the opponent's this web page />You will categorize the ranges between Loose or Tight.
This kind of strategy is somewhat hard and better suited if you have the guarantee the match is a heads up, or both you are in the final part of the tournament and so it turned into a heads up.
For this, I will assume this is an online tournament and you cannot predict or infer other type of behaviours but just the range.
Your final goal here is to get action from the other player, playing you tight, and playing him loose.
Still you have absolutely no way to predict whether you will lose or win in an deterministic way, and having to shovel is quite decisive to be analyzed in only one tournament since the final matter is random and statistical.
But let's assume the EV becomes somehow the deterministic answer this means: the better EV, you instantly win, just for this theoretical model.
Since this is heads up, you're always in the https://clearadultskin.com/poker/sun-casino-monaco-poker.html positions dealer or cut-off and so by position or perhaps the closeness to a short-stack amount and so the see more you will also play, under certain circumstance, down to 5-4 connectors.
A2, KQ, QJ, JT.
This is just an opinion and perhaps you'll put the line between the "upper" and "lower" by estimating the equity from the enemy's side since you will definitely go all-insorting the hands by % of winning and capping drawing the line when you add up the % to that metric you calculated beforehand.
There's no change here.
He may or may not go.
Our target is he goes, and we find he is playing a lower range.
In Prisoner's Dilemma language, you want to betray him while he cooperates.
Why would he want to play your all-in?
So he says: Should I go or fold?
I'm not so fresh with the hold'em EV for heads-up only.
But let's state this question from his view point: How strong my hand is, absolutely?
In particular you published an article with the this web page of 5-card draw hands.
The idea would be analogous here but considering an EV of power of possible 5-card hands based on the poker shove possible outcomes in the commie cards.
So assume you can compute such power and say In average, the % of winning of my hand is %W.
Actually, he will say that.
You're definitely on shoveling right now.
At this point, we did not consider your cards, because I'm just focusing on him, initially, with no additional information about your rank but just the good practice of playing up to 54o again: this is heads up holdem: in regularly cold hands, we are in position to play up to that poker shove />Ideally, we'd click here him to be used to the fact we play a loose range with somewhat big amounts of chips is it still ethical to show your hand when you previously shoveled and he folded?
To an extent that he says okay, now I estimate his new range, I recalculate the %EB and %EL for my current hand.
Calculation: Usually you estimate a range your opponent plays.
Initially, we say it will be 54o under this circunstances.
Then, given your hand, you iterate over all the possible 2-cards combinations of the expected opponent's range say, Nadd up the %EB, %ET and %EL or each comparisson e.
Perhaps this calculation poker runs delaware quite complex and long, and you already performed them and have your own shortcut, but you get the idea.
Now go back to the start and let's simplify a while.
Both you and Villain will have only two types of ranges: the tight one reaching AK and the loose one reaching 54o.
The villain, based on your previous behaviour, will establish a Hurwicz coefficient H 0.
You want him to call, so you want him to perceive the H close to 0.
After that, predicting the behaviours of betraying poker shove />As you see there are a lot of strategies.
I have no up-to-date documentation of how do they beat each other.
For very long games, I think you should be prepared for complex game theory interactions.
However, for short games perhaps very quick blinds?
I did not mean to be that strict in the terms.
I just mean to make him soften his range a bit, and right there you go tight.
I didn't mean like "yeah!
You can draw the line in a different place than where I drew it, but the reasoning behind is not that different: You still have the mechanichs to estimate, force a belief of a range, and then make them enter.
With that in mind: Your assumption is right.
But as you said: "sacrificing the lowest part of your range", then I immediately recalled: this is what I called "cooperate": you invite a call to action by establishing a tradition and then biasing their H coefficient.
Let say your open to 2.
Say your re-raise jam is top 34 hands.
Assume your opponent plays the same.
No matter what your shove range is if you are shoving with the same range as your opponent's raise range then you are slightly ahead as you pick up the overlay.
Opponent should call every time.
Even if you raise 2.
With the pot odds they should even be calling with top poker shove hands even if they put you on a top 34 hands.
So I proved not much mathematically.
You can jam with the range you think your opponent is raising visit web page and you are positive EV.
Big stacks behind poker shove a different story.
Re-raise 2x the pot with top 34 hand and get raised back is harder as then you might need to lay down TT and AKs and maybe more.
This is because you are not trying an iterative game theory model!
You could think it as a variant of the prisoner's dilemma where "betraying" means only playing tight ranges, and "cooperating" with your mate, not the prosecutor means playing a somewhat "looser" rank.
Quite busy and this is the best tip I can give you so far: try a variant of prisoner's dilemma perhaps mixed with a hurwicz coefficient to choose among different ranks.
Finally you will end up with an iterative model.
Provide details and share your research!
To learn more, see our.

CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

typically I play nightly in a $20 / 10k MTT.local online tournament where field is softer i know in deep stacks, it's typical to shove when ...


Enjoy!
ERROR: The request could not be satisfied
Valid for casinos
The Best Short Stack Poker Strategy (Free Poker Chart) | BlackRain79 - Micro Stakes Poker Strategy
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
poker shove

B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

With a stack this short, all you have to do is decide whether to shove or fold. Here, you'll find as close to a poker "system" as there is available.


Enjoy!
Tournament Push-or-Fold Decision Calculator - Exceptional Poker...
Valid for casinos
HeadsUp Push/Fold Nash Equilibrium - clearadultskin.com
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Professional SNG Play, Ep. 5 - ICM & Shoving

BN55TO644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

The following is a glossary of poker terms used in the card game of poker. It supplements the glossary of card game terms. Besides the terms listed here, there ...


Enjoy!
Tournament Push-or-Fold Decision Calculator - Exceptional Poker...
Valid for casinos
poker strategy - Pre shove range - Poker Stack Exchange
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
poker shove

BN55TO644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

A shove is also known as a jam or push.. 3 Best Poker Tips from a Cash Game Session with Doug Polk · 3 Hand Histories That Highlight a ...


Enjoy!
YouTube
Valid for casinos
The Best Short Stack Poker Strategy (Free Poker Chart) | BlackRain79 - Micro Stakes Poker Strategy
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Are u guys inducing here wih 10 bbs or shoving?
Unless there are definately some super aggro players on your table.
If everyone was 10-15 poker shove deep then you could min raise here and maybe induce a shuv from a tiny pair or a QJs or something.
With KK or AA here I think 3 - 3.
This way you can get value when non one has a hand good enough to call a shuv.
Raise any smaller and you risk multiple callers which would not be great, but I wouldn't be too unhappy about it.
With the 3- 3.
And since these are the hands calling your shuv anyway you lose no value verses these hands by raising instead of folding.
Sure, you risk the BB calling with any shitty Ax and flopping an ace, but you can still save yourself if this happens.
But you want him calling with any shitty Ax, which he probably wont if you shuv.
In poker shove you need to be maximising value here with KK and AA with 10bb.
You will always get action from 88+, AJ+ and ATs, shuv or raise.
But you also need to try to suck some value out of hands that are never calling a shuv but are too pretty to fold to a raise from a short stack.
The other huge added value by raising here instead of folding, especially from your position is this.
Say one of the big stacks makes that call poker shove a pretty suited connector, but then someone else wakes up with a TT+ or big Ace.
You can then get it in with those extra 3-3-5bb in the pot.
And often the gto poker book stack suited connector guy still pays to see the flop anyway.
Shuvving pre is still a nice profitable play, but I think you can squeeze a poker shove more value out of it by raising to 3 or 3.
Just too risky letting someone in cheap with all those overcards to hit on the flop.
Edited April 13, 2019 by nivvydoh Shoving that there!
For 1 thing it looks like youre trying to avoid playing out of position and in a way means your range looks wider to potential callers, but also when you do get called, top poker tournaments kk down earns your future shoves a little more click here, and hopefully more fold equity?
Join the conversation You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.
Important Information We have placed on your device to help make this website better.
You canotherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

A67444455
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

This free Grinderschool poker training video is part 2 of 6 on Againstime's "Shove Calling" series, with the episode focusing on complex ...


Enjoy!
Graham Shove: Hendon Mob Poker Database
Valid for casinos
HeadsUp Push/Fold Nash Equilibrium - clearadultskin.com
Visits
Dislikes
Comments

🤑 YouTube

Software - MORE
BN55TO644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

I see lots of info on open shove ranges from various positions as a short stack. However, here is a situation I find myself in on occasion.


Enjoy!
Poker Tournament Strategy: 15 Big Blinds and Below
Valid for casinos
HeadsUp Push/Fold Nash Equilibrium - clearadultskin.com
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
poker shove

TT6335644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

The following is a glossary of poker terms used in the card game of poker. It supplements the glossary of card game terms. Besides the terms listed here, there ...


Enjoy!
Tournament Push-or-Fold Decision Calculator - Exceptional Poker...
Valid for casinos
HeadsUp Push/Fold Nash Equilibrium - clearadultskin.com
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
poker shove

B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Welcome to Poker Copilot's Essential Strategy series, where we take a look at. preflop and consider each decision as either a fold or a shove.


Enjoy!
The Best Short Stack Poker Strategy (Free Poker Chart) | BlackRain79 - Micro Stakes Poker Strategy
Valid for casinos
Poker Tournament Strategy: 15 Big Blinds and Below
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
The charts below show the Nash Equilibrium strategies for two player push-or-fold NLHE.
This is a simplified game where the SB is only allowed to go all-in or fold, and the BB can either call or fold when tv sky poker a shove.
Pusher A K Q J T 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 A 20+ 20+ poker shove 20+ 20+ 20+ 20+ 20+ 20+ 20+ 20+ 20+ 20+ K poker shove 20+ 20+ 20+ 20+ 20+ 20+ 20+ 20+ 20+ 20+ 19.
Values bigger than 20 are only displayed as 20+, which means the hand can be played for any stack size of 20bb or less.
Playing push-or-fold is typically only recommended up to around 10bb, depending on the situation.
For example 63s is included in the pushing strategy for stack sizes between 7.
So the relevant stack size for both players in this hand is 6.
To find the strategy for SB's T3s, check the green area suited hands of the "Pusher" chart.
The value for T3s is 7.
To determine if the BB should call with his Q2o, check the orange area offsuit hands of the "Caller" chart and locate Q2o.
The value there is 5.
The effective stacks in the current hand are larger than the value for Q2o, so this hand is a fold in the Nash Equilibrium strategy.
The solution available on this site was independently calculated and published in 2007 as part of a coding experiment, inspired by the discussion of the topic in Mathematics of Poker.
Similar charts have been published by various sources, including SNGPT and Mathematics of Poker, and there are some minor differences between them.
The exact Nash solution is considerably more complex and the chart only shows a simplified version.
Most hands are actually played with mixed strategies for at least a few stack sizes, and many hands poker shove multiple smaller gaps in poker shove strategy, similar to the 63s, 53s, 43s hands.
These details are omitted in the chart to allow a compact representation of the strategy.
The differences in published solutions are most likely due to choices made when simplifying the exact solution into easy-to-use charts.
Due to the considerable number of rather arbitrary choices when simplifying into chart form, it is actually quite unlikely that two independently created charts would perfectly match.
This data can be used to derive the charts.
For practical purposes the chart form should be completely sufficient though.
The data linked here was re-calculated with a later version than the original chart data, see more there may be some very slight differences.

G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Yes, I would call there with a range of A-10 suited and above. I would lay down 66 and lower. I know 66 is ahead of a10.


Enjoy!
Poker Tournament Strategy: 15 Big Blinds and Below
Valid for casinos
poker strategy - Pre shove range - Poker Stack Exchange
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Say you want to play mathematical poker and you want to balance your pre shove range.
A range where your opponent has shown strength.
Either they came poker shove for a raise and you are in position or they raised you when you opened out of position.
Assume you always open for 2.
Assume you are medium stack 30-40 BB inside the Harrington green zone.
The object here is how wide to make your range so you can get optimal action when you do have AA KK.
The bottom of your range will likely be behind but it is sacrificed to get more action when you are ahead.
If you only shove with QQ+ there are not very many hands 18.
If your opponent knows you only shove with QQ+ then they should only call with KK+.
Not enough balance to get action when you do have AA.
If you shove with TT+ now you should mathematically get action from QQ+.
Is that enough balance.
So now Poker shove and KK can get action from KK and QQ.
TT+ feels kind of tight to me and I would add in AKs.
Still only 34 hands.
But then only 40% equity against JJ+.
I think a better question would have been to put the opponent on a range but I already asked it.
What I kind of like about a tight raise range is now your call hands can include some strong hands.
I know should mix up play.
And should mix in bluffs.
This a somewhat hypothetical question.
https://clearadultskin.com/poker/replay-poker-promo-code.html real life I would add in some What would be your shove range in that situation?
I would like to get the math but just your opinion is good.
I don't think position matters here as this is limited to a re-raise and there is no position after an all in.
You come in for 5 and get raised to 10.
There would be like https://clearadultskin.com/poker/sklansky-poker.html in the pot.
You have 25 behind so it is not that much of an over-bet.
If you have 60 you would have 55 behind so it is a big over-bet.
But if you raise to 30 you are pot committed and they know it.
Should I assume a BSS from the other party?
You said you were above green zone but also said the guy is above you.
I ask: How many times above?
Even if it is chips if they have more chips than me it is just my stack I am betting.
I would not want to.
I don't know if, so far, I understood correctly.
It certainly plays better source TT that is 20%.
I look forward to answers.
This would require you somewhat analyze the opponent's range.
You will categorize the ranges between Loose or Tight.
This kind of strategy is somewhat hard and better suited if you have the guarantee the match is a heads up, or both you are in the final part of the tournament and so it turned into poker shove heads up.
For this, I will assume this is an online tournament and you cannot predict or infer other type of behaviours but just the range.
Your final goal here is to get action from the other player, playing you tight, and playing him loose.
Still you have absolutely no way to predict whether you will lose or win in an deterministic way, and having to shovel is quite decisive to poker shove analyzed in only one tournament since the final matter is random and statistical.
But let's assume the EV becomes somehow the deterministic answer this means: the better EV, you instantly win, just for this theoretical model.
Since this is heads up, you're always in the best positions dealer or cut-off and so by position or perhaps the closeness to a short-stack amount and so the strategy you will also play, under certain circumstance, down to 5-4 connectors.
A2, KQ, QJ, JT.
This is just an opinion and perhaps you'll put the line between the "upper" and "lower" by estimating the equity from the enemy's side since you will definitely go all-insorting the hands by % of winning and capping drawing the line when you add up the % to that metric you calculated beforehand.
There's no change here.
He may or may not go.
Our target is he goes, and we find he is playing a lower range.
In Prisoner's Dilemma language, you want to betray him while he cooperates.
Why would he want to play your all-in?
So he says: Should I go or fold?
I'm not so fresh with the hold'em EV for heads-up only.
But let's state this question from his view point: How strong my hand is, absolutely?
In particular you published an article with the strength of 5-card draw hands.
The idea would be analogous here but considering an EV of power of possible 5-card hands based on the all possible outcomes in the commie cards.
So assume you can compute such power and say In average, the % of winning of my hand is %W.
Actually, he will say that.
You're definitely on shoveling right now.
At this point, we did not consider your cards, because I'm just focusing on him, initially, with no additional information about your rank but just the good practice of playing up to 54o again: this is heads up holdem: in regularly cold hands, we are in position to play up to that range.
Ideally, we'd want him to be used to the fact we play a loose range with somewhat big amounts of chips is it still ethical to show your hand when you previously shoveled and he folded?
To an extent that he says okay, now I estimate his new range, I recalculate the %EB and %EL for my current hand.
Calculation: Usually you estimate a range your opponent plays.
Initially, we say it will be 54o under this circunstances.
Then, given your hand, you iterate over all the possible 2-cards combinations of the expected opponent's range say, Nadd up the %EB, %ET and %EL or each comparisson e.
Perhaps this calculation is quite complex and long, and you already performed them and have your own shortcut, but you get the idea.
Now go back to the start and let's simplify a while.
Both you and Villain will have only two types of ranges: the tight one reaching AK and the loose one reaching 54o.
The villain, based on your previous behaviour, will establish a Hurwicz coefficient H 0.
You want him to call, so see more want birmingham star casino at poker city to perceive the H close to 0.
After that, predicting the behaviours of betraying vs.
As you see there are a lot of strategies.
I have no up-to-date documentation of how do they beat each other.
For very long games, I think you should be prepared for complex game theory interactions.
However, for short games perhaps very quick blinds?
I did not mean to be that strict in the terms.
I https://clearadultskin.com/poker/rainbow-casino-cash-poker-room.html mean to make him soften his range a bit, and right there you go tight.
I didn't mean like "yeah!
You can draw the line in a different place than where I drew it, but the reasoning behind is not that different: You still have the mechanichs to estimate, force a belief of a range, and then make them enter.
With that in mind: Your assumption is right.
But as you said: "sacrificing the lowest part of your range", then I immediately recalled: this is what I called "cooperate": you invite a call to action by establishing a tradition and then biasing their H coefficient.
Let say your open to 2.
Say your re-raise jam is top 34 hands.
Assume your opponent plays the same.
No matter what your shove range is if you are shoving with the same range as your opponent's raise range then you are slightly ahead as you pick up the overlay.
Opponent should call every time.
Even if you raise 2.
With the pot odds they should even be calling with top 70 hands even if they put you on a top 34 hands.
So I proved not much mathematically.
You can jam with the range you think your opponent is raising with and you are positive EV.
Big stacks behind is a different story.
Re-raise 2x the pot with top 34 hand and get raised back is harder as then you might need to lay down TT and AKs and maybe more.
This is because you are not trying an iterative game theory model!
You could think it as poker shove variant of the prisoner's dilemma where "betraying" means only playing tight ranges, and "cooperating" with your mate, not the prosecutor means playing a somewhat "looser" rank.
Quite busy and this is the best tip I can give you so far: try a variant of prisoner's dilemma perhaps mixed with a hurwicz coefficient to choose among different ranks.
Finally you will end up with an iterative model.
Provide details and share your research!
To learn more, see our.